DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
701 S. COURTHOUSE ROAD, SUITE 1001
ARLINGTON, VA 22204-2490
BC
Docket No: 08998-13
3 October 2014
This is in reference to your application for correction of your
naval record pursuant to. the provisions of title 10 of the
United States Code, section 1552.
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval
Records, sitting in executive session, considered your
application on 1 October 2014. The names and votes of the
members of the panel will be furnished upon request. Your
allegations of error and injustice were reviewed in accordance
with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the
proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by
the Board consisted of your application, together with all
material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and
applicable statutes, regulations, and policies.
After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire
record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient
to establish the existence of probable material error or
injustice.
You enlisted in the Navy and. began a period of active duty on 16
April 1990. You received nonjudicial punishment (NJP) on three
occasions. Your offenses were failure to go to your appointed
place of duty, assault by ripping off a woman’s top, destruction
to private property, making a false official statement and
willfully and wrongfully cause damage to a motor vehicle.
Subsequently, you were notified of pending administrative
‘separation by reason of misconduct due to a pattern of
misconduct at which time you waived your procedural rights to
consult with legal counsel and to present your case to an
administrative discharge board (ADB). Your commanding officer
recommended discharge under other than honorable conditions by
reason of misconduct due to a pattern of misconduct. The
discharge authority approved this recommendation and directed
separation under other than honorable conditions by reason of
misconduct, and on 5 September 1991, you were so discharged and
assigned an RE-4 (ineligible for reenlistment) reentry code.
The Board, in its review of your entire record and application,
carefully weighed all potentially mitigating factors, such as
your desire to upgrade your discharge, and assertion that the
charges were bogus. jNevertheless, the Board concluded these
factors were not sufficient to warrant relief in your case
because of the seriousness of your repeated misconduct.
Further, you were given an opportunity to defend your actions,
but waived your procedural rights. Finally, there is no
“evidence in the record, and you provided none, to support your
assertion. Accordingly, your application has been denied.
It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such
that favorable action cannot be taken. You are entitled to have
the Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and
material evidence within one year from the date of the Board's
decision. New evidence is evidence not previously considered by
the Board prior to making its decision in your case. In this
regard, it is important to keep in mind that a presumption of
regularity attaches to all official records. Consequently, when
applying for a correction of an official naval record, the
burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of
probable material error or injustice.
Sincerely,
ROBERT J. O’NEILL
Bxecutive Director
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR8966 13
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 1 October 2014. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with ail material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR2593 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 18 November 2014. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. Subsequently, administrative discharge action was initiated by reason of misconduct due to a pattern of misconduct.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR309 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 17 December 2014. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR2657 14
A ‘three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of - your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. — Consequentiy, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR241 14
BR three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on > December 2014. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. After waiving your procedural rights, On 7 October 1992, your commanding officer recommended discharge under other than honorable conditions by...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR2117 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Recc sitting in executive session, considered your application on 17 December 2014. Nevertheless, the Board found that these factors were not sufficient to warrant recharacterization of your discharge given the seriousness of your misconduct. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR4544 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 29 April 2015. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. The discharge authority concurred with the ADB and directed separation under honorable conditions by reason of misconduct, and on 12 October 1994,...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR2593 14_Redacted
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 18 November 2014. Documentary material considered by O ed of your application, together with all mater: pport ther naval record, and applicable ions, After and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice You enlisted in the Navy and began...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR3141-13
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 701-5, COURTHOUSE ROAD, SUITE 1001 - ARLINGTON, VA 22204-24906 : TIR
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR6604 13
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 22 July 2014. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...